WASHINGTON: The US respects Pakistan s sovereignty but will carry out strikes to eliminate terrorists who target its forces, said US State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner. Toner was responding to questions on Pakistan hitting out at the US for launching the drone strike on its soil to kill Mansour, describing it as a “violation of its sovereignty”.
“The strike sends a clear message that those who target Americans and Afghans are not going to be given a safe haven. And also that there s only one option for the Taliban and that is to pursue a peaceful resolution to the conflict,” Toner added.
He said it also sends the message that the Taliban must decide what its future is going to be, and wondered whether it could contribute politically to a peaceful Afghanistan in future. He urged the Taliban to sit down with the Afghan government and begin negotiations and talks, declaring that the United States supported an Afghan-owned, Afghan led process.
The drone attack against Mansour just inside Pakistan on Saturday was carried out under US rules of engagement that allow US forces to conduct defensive strikes against people engaged in activity threatening US and coalition personnel, said Navy Captain Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman. US President Barack Obama approved the strike on Mansour based on a law authorising military force in Afghanistan following the September 11 attacks, Pentagon officials said. Since the strike was conducted in Pakistan, it required presidential authorisation.
Davis told reporters it was the first time he was aware of that the US military had conducted an attack inside Pakistan under the Pentagon’s rules of engagement governing defensive strikes. Other strikes inside Pakistan, including one that killed al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in 2011, have been based on rules authorising counterterrorism operations, a Pentagon official said.
“This was considered a defensive strike and given the location (Pakistan) required a higher level of approval,” Davis told a briefing.
“This (Mansour) was an individual who was specifically targeting US and coalition personnel and had specifically engaged in operations in the past that resulted in US and coalition personnel being killed,” Davis said.
Pressed on whether Mansour had simply been engaged in general plotting or if there was something more specific in the works, Davis said the Taliban chief had been plotting “specific actions, specific things in real time.” Asked if the threats were imminent, he said: “Yes, specific imminent threats to US and coalition personnel in Afghanistan.”
The White House has interpreted the law passed after the 2001 attacks as granting the military the legal authority it needs to conduct air strikes against the Taliban and other groups under certain conditions. Davis avoided saying whether Washington had notified Pakistan before the attack, but he said the two sides have an ongoing dialogue and had discussed Mansour in the past.
